Culture and Cancer

Genetic mechanisms, since they broadly involve information transmission, should be translatable into information dynamics formalism. From this perspective we reconsider the adaptive mutator, one possible means of 'second order selection' by which a highly structured 'language' of environment and development writes itself onto the variation upon which evolutionary selection and tumorigenesis operate. Our approach uses recent results in the spirit of the Large Deviations Program of applied probability that permit transfer of phase transition approaches from statistical mechanics to information theory, generating evolutionary and developmental punctuation in what we claim to be a highly natural manner

Epigenetic analysis of regulatory T cells using multiplex bisulfite sequencing.

This work was supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 096388, JDRF Grant 9-2011-253, the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and Award P01AI039671 (to LSW. and JAT.) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). CW is supported by the Wellcome Trust (089989). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIAID or the National Institutes of Health. The Cambridge Institute for Medical Research is in receipt of Wellcome Trust Strategic Award 100140. We gratefully acknowledge the participation of all NIHR Cambridge BioResource volunteers. We thank the Cambridge BioResource staff for their help with volunteer recruitment. We thank members of the Cambridge BioResource SAB and Management Committee for their support of our study and the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre for funding. We thank Fay Rodger and Ruth Littleboy for running the Illumina MiSeq in the Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge. This research was supported by the Cambridge NIHR BRC Cell Phenotyping Hub. In particular, we wish to thank Anna Petrunkina Harrison, Simon McCallum, Christopher Bowman, Natalia Savinykh, Esther Perez and Jelena Markovic Djuric for their advice and support in cell sorting. We also thank Helen Stevens, Pamela Clarke, Gillian Coleman, Sarah Dawson, Jennifer Denesha, Simon Duley, Meeta Maisuria-Armer and Trupti Mistry for acquisition and preparation of samples.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Wiley via http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.20154564

Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI): a single-blind randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Remote ischaemic conditioning with transient ischaemia and reperfusion applied to the arm has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We investigated whether remote ischaemic conditioning could reduce the incidence of cardiac death and hospitalisation for heart failure at 12 months. METHODS: We did an international investigator-initiated, prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial (CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI) at 33 centres across the UK, Denmark, Spain, and Serbia. Patients (age >18 years) with suspected STEMI and who were eligible for PPCI were randomly allocated (1:1, stratified by centre with a permuted block method) to receive standard treatment (including a sham simulated remote ischaemic conditioning intervention at UK sites only) or remote ischaemic conditioning treatment (intermittent ischaemia and reperfusion applied to the arm through four cycles of 5-min inflation and 5-min deflation of an automated cuff device) before PPCI. Investigators responsible for data collection and outcome assessment were masked to treatment allocation. The primary combined endpoint was cardiac death or hospitalisation for heart failure at 12 months in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02342522) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Nov 6, 2013, and March 31, 2018, 5401 patients were randomly allocated to either the control group (n=2701) or the remote ischaemic conditioning group (n=2700). After exclusion of patients upon hospital arrival or loss to follow-up, 2569 patients in the control group and 2546 in the intervention group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 12 months post-PPCI, the Kaplan-Meier-estimated frequencies of cardiac death or hospitalisation for heart failure (the primary endpoint) were 220 (8·6%) patients in the control group and 239 (9·4%) in the remote ischaemic conditioning group (hazard ratio 1·10 [95% CI 0·91-1·32], p=0·32 for intervention versus control). No important unexpected adverse events or side effects of remote ischaemic conditioning were observed. INTERPRETATION: Remote ischaemic conditioning does not improve clinical outcomes (cardiac death or hospitalisation for heart failure) at 12 months in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation, University College London Hospitals/University College London Biomedical Research Centre, Danish Innovation Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, TrygFonden

Epigenetic analysis of regulatory T cells using multiplex bisulfite sequencing

This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Wiley via http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545646This work was supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 096388, JDRF Grant 9-2011-253, the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and Award P01AI039671 (to LSW. and JAT.) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). CW is supported by the Wellcome Trust (089989). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIAID or the National Institutes of Health. The Cambridge Institute for Medical Research is in receipt of Wellcome Trust Strategic Award 100140. We gratefully acknowledge the participation of all NIHR Cambridge BioResource volunteers. We thank the Cambridge BioResource staff for their help with volunteer recruitment. We thank members of the Cambridge BioResource SAB and Management Committee for their support of our study and the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre for funding. We thank Fay Rodger and Ruth Littleboy for running the Illumina MiSeq in the Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge. This research was supported by the Cambridge NIHR BRC Cell Phenotyping Hub. In particular, we wish to thank Anna Petrunkina Harrison, Simon McCallum, Christopher Bowman, Natalia Savinykh, Esther Perez and Jelena Markovic Djuric for their advice and support in cell sorting. We also thank Helen Stevens, Pamela Clarke, Gillian Coleman, Sarah Dawson, Jennifer Denesha, Simon Duley, Meeta Maisuria-Armer and Trupti Mistry for acquisition and preparation of samples

Management methods and demonstration on pollution load control of Song-Liao river basin

This deliverables reports the “aquatic eco-function zoning map” delineation activities of the SUSTAIN H2O project consortium during the project’s reporting period

Regulation of flagellar motility by the conserved flagellar protein CG34110/Ccdc135/FAP50

This study reports the function of a conserved flagellar protein CG34110, which has highly conserved orthologues in species containing motile cilia. It appears to represent a novel regulatory protein located on the outer doublet microtubules of the axoneme across a broad range of species